Post
Counting "users" when pricing nocode tools.
There seems to be a big divide between nocode tools which are intended for inhouse use only and those which may be used to build public-facing products.
I have a side project I'm interested in tackling with a noCode tool, partly as learning activity and partly because it's a minor itch to scratch.
I posted a long list of points on a few places, most response so far on Indie Hackers
One of the things this little exercise made me puzzle over is the sometimes-unspoken intended use. It becomes clearer when you look at how prices escalate.
AWS Honeycode is moderately explicit _ free to use for teams with up to 20 members_ and it's $9.99/month for each additional member.
Bubble.io doesn't mention users or authorisation limits.
Mentioned
#DevelopmentShare
This post has no responses yet.
When you've got too many things to do, how do you keep track of them all? Have you started using a new to-do list app recently, or found an old one is still doing the job well? The last time we di...
With the recent shutdowns of Woven calendar and x.ai, scheduling productivity has taken a hit. Which tools do you swear by? Will calendar and scheduling point solutions continue to get swallowed w...
